<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Caffeine gives SEOs the Jitters</title> <atom:link href="http://www.bluesnapper.com/blog/seo/google-caffeine-seo-jitters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.bluesnapper.com/blog/seo/google-caffeine-seo-jitters/</link> <description>Drive. Analyse. Optimise.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Mackeran</title><link>http://www.bluesnapper.com/blog/seo/google-caffeine-seo-jitters/comment-page-1/#comment-3820</link> <dc:creator>Mackeran</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:47:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesnapper.com/blog/?p=763#comment-3820</guid> <description>Are you a professional journalist? You write very well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you a professional journalist? You write very well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bluesnapper</title><link>http://www.bluesnapper.com/blog/seo/google-caffeine-seo-jitters/comment-page-1/#comment-3819</link> <dc:creator>bluesnapper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:28:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluesnapper.com/blog/?p=763#comment-3819</guid> <description>Hi Rob. Thanks for your comment.
Without any guidelines from Google, page-load speed is subjective. Providing you use tools such as Google&#039;s page speed or webpagetest (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webpagetest.org)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.webpagetest.org)&lt;/a&gt; to assess whether you have an issue and then optimise as much as you can, you should be on track.
It&#039;s well known that visitors bail if a page doesn&#039;t load quickly enough but its not often a priority fix unless it&#039;s really bad; it makes sense that Google is making this an SEO issue as a sloooow loading page will mean a poor search-experience for the user. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob. Thanks for your comment.</p><p>Without any guidelines from Google, page-load speed is subjective. Providing you use tools such as Google&#039;s page speed or webpagetest (<a
href="http://www.webpagetest.org)" target="_blank"></a><a
href="http://www.webpagetest.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.webpagetest.org</a>) to assess whether you have an issue and then optimise as much as you can, you should be on track.</p><p>It&#039;s well known that visitors bail if a page doesn&#039;t load quickly enough but its not often a priority fix unless it&#039;s really bad; it makes sense that Google is making this an SEO issue as a sloooow loading page will mean a poor search-experience for the user.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 13/22 queries in 0.151 seconds using disk

Served from: www.bluesnapper.com @ 2012-02-05 06:10:51 -->
